Dutch tulip or a cup of bitter Brazilian coffee?

Report By: Hamdollah Emadi Heidari

Tehran, July 4, IRNA -- The Brazil-Dutch match during the World Cup 2010 and some of the unsporting points at the sidelines backed the idea that the Brazilians deserved the defeat gave rise to the suspicion that the victory of the “land of tulips” was politically-motivated.

The result of the match inspired the question in the mind of soccer lovers that are victory or defeat of the teams in the world cups determined in far away from that green pitch?

Let’s remember that there have been indications that the hegemony seeking powers are used to taking advantage of the world cup games to get their political voice heard worldwide.

Sociologists believe that: “when soccer matches start in an international scale, then it is the time for the element of politics to come to the scene at high level dosage so that the countries begin to follow their own political games to advance their national interests in the pitch… a clear example, was Mussolini who employed the victorious Italian national football players in the services of his own objectives in 1934 and 1938 describing them as “soldiers serving their national interests”. The French President Jacques Chirac, too, called the victory of French National Soccer Team in World Cup 1998 as the “victory of France.”

** What the Zionists attempted to do with the Green Continent

One prevailing suggestion has been that given the ever-growing influence of Zionists on the green continent including the Netherlands, the probable victory of Dutch soccer players in the 19th world cup could potentially be regarded as a moral support for those politicians whom the Zionists are zealously supporting to gain power in the Netherlands.

Manipulating Sporting Events
Manipulating sporting events as a universally effective instrument in gaining external objectives has always been on agenda of various Zionist protocols and capitalist system.

A close look at some political incidents in such countries as Italy, France and the Netherlands clearly discloses how Zionists are endeavoring to tightern their grip over the continent.

The rightist policy of France’s President Nicolas Sarkozy who unquestioningly follows the US policies and the White House views has made the supporters of an independent France as well as the French leftists protest what is going on.

Observers studying the European developments believe the failure of France during the World Cup 2010, too, was taken as good news by Sarkozy because the defeat would overshadow the failure of his economic and political policies.

And in Italy, the victory of the rightist party led by Silvio Berlusconi - who owns AC Milan Club – in the much-questioned elections in 2008, brought fascists who are strongly opposed to immigrants to power in Italy.

It seems that the Zionist lobbies are mobilizing all their military, political and media leverages to take power in the green continent and eliminate leftists.

**Islamists and leftists; a threat to the very existence of the Zionist regime
Having observed frank reactions of the international public opinion and the governments against the Israeli massacre of passengers aboard Freedom Flotilla, the Zionist regime Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had just recently stated that “Islamists and leftists in the world are determined to destroy Israel.”

His remarks reveal how extremely the Zionist regime fears anti-imperialism movements and their victory in elections which will make the ones who decide about matters.

**the significance of the country of courts for Zionists

After France and Italy, now it is the Netherlands’ turn, a country which hosts a number of world’s most important courts like the international criminal court in charge of examining the war crimes, the court which is supposed to deal with Richard Goldstone report on Israeli war crimes during its 22-day aggression on Gaza.

A coalition led by Christian-democratic party is currently ruling the Netherlands which also gives a position both to leftists and religious powers in the power structure of the country. This deeply irritates Israel.

** Recurring referee mistakes during the 19th world cup
One other point supporting this article is the frequent and persistent referee mistakes in the world cup 2010 which made the FIFA head apologize to the world community. The increasing number of wrong decisions in the final stages gives rise to doubts on the true reasons of referees in behaving like this.

According to the news agencies, most of soccer experts evaluated the good performance of referees as one of the strong points of the 19th world cup, but, as the rivalries grew more intense, the referees, too, started to act in a vague manner. This culminated in the first play-off round.

Experts question the performance of the referees who neglected the violent behavior of those players who kept attacking technical Brazilian football players and shouted on referees and players, wondering how was it that Van Bommel did not receive any fines for disturbing Kaka for a whole time of 90 minutes.

The Argentina national soccer team coach, Diego Maradona, too, criticized referee performances ahead of the match between his team and Germans during the quarter-final this year.

Now the question is “did those who determine the destinies in the world cup 2010 preferred the “tulip” to “a cup of bitter Brazilian coffee?” And, how are the results of the remaining matches being determined?

Are the results of the matches determined on the green pitches or are there both known and unknown hands playing behind the scene; the same hands which barred the United Nations Security Council from issuing resolutions against the criminal Zionist regime? Will they determine the destiny of the teams in world cup 2010 in a place away from the matches?